Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. Google Pixel 4a is a somewhat lighter device than Sony Xperia XZs, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bigger screen and a just a bit better screen density.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more 2.2 GHz CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with more storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity. Sony Xperia XZs counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 19 mega-pixels resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and higher 960 fps video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.