Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Just black | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.