Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Just black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 general score. The Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has a more recent 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, providing the user some additional features and improved performance.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a and the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro both feature quite similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.