Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 77.5. The Google Pixel 4a design is incredibly newer and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, but it is also just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a higher pixel amount in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a also has a more MP camera, a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5300mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4a costs more money than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.