Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Just black | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's global score of 82.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4a, but it's noticeably heavier. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 8% bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a camera that is just as good as Google Pixel 4a's camera, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lower video resolution, a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video and a camera with a lower resolution, they both have a same size back camera sensor.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4a, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.