Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Ceramic |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, having a score of 82.9 against 79.8. Even though Google Pixel 4a and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold were released only 8 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a construction is extremely lighter but a little bit thicker. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger display and a higher 1860 x 2480 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.