Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-03-13 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 80.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a is a way lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a bit higher display density. Google Pixel 4a features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4a and the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro both have really similar memory capacity to install applications and games, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Xiaomi Note 7 Pro counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.