Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Just black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, with a general score of 82.9 against 78.7. Google Pixel 4a's body is just a little thinner and much lighter than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even though they were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and Google Pixel 4a both have quite similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.