Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Just black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Google Pixel 4a's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.