Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Just black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 score. Google Pixel 4a's construction is a bit thinner and way lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, even when both were released only 8 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 operating system.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low-light environments, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.