Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, getting a global score of 82.9 against 82.4. Google Pixel 4a's construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's lighter. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.