Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Just black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting an 82.9 score against 78.2. Google Pixel 4a's body is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, even though both of them were only released 8 months apart. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite inferior pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 4a features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, else you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.