Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having a overall score of 86.1 against 82.9. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro design is incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4a.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's memory for apps and games is just as good as Google Pixel 4a's one, both have equal internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.