Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Just black | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 82.9 against 77.1. Google Pixel 4a's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but it's much lighter. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a larger screen, a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit greater number of pixels in each display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.