Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Just black | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, getting an 83.1 score against 82.9. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 13 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a way newer phone, and it's also incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4a.
Google Pixel 4a has a much greater performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same display pixel density, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G also has a slightly higher 1220 x 2710px resolution and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.