Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-11-23 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a global score of 82.9 against 77.2. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer, incredibly lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4a shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.