Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's overall score of 80.3. The Google Pixel 4a is a lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but both have the same thickness. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a little better screen density.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera, higher video frame rate and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.