Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Just black | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a score of 82.9 against 80.2. Google Pixel 4a is a newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it is just a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera with way more megapixels and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.