Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a bit better than the Google Pixel 5, getting a 93.2 score against 89. Even though the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot heavier than Google Pixel 5, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a bit better number of pixels in each display inch, a better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a superior processing power than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less RAM memory and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Google Pixel 5 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a back camera with a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max and Google Pixel 5 both feature incredibly similar memory for games and applications, both have equal internal memory capacity. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4352mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 5. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 5, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.