Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is a bit better than the iPhone X's 88.1 general score. Although the Google Pixel 5 is a bit thicker than the iPhone X, it's somewhat lighter and way newer. The iPhone X has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a quite higher pixels density. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images, a back facing camera with a better resolution and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
IPhone X features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
The Google Pixel 5 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.