Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, getting a score of 89 against 82. The Google Pixel 5 construction is newer, just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the Apple iPhone XR. The Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 2 less cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 5 and the Apple iPhone XR feature quite similar displays, because although the Apple iPhone XR has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Google Pixel 5 takes a bit better videos and photos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same video definition, a 0.39 inches sensor and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger camera aperture and a higher resolution back camera.
The Google Pixel 5 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 5 has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 5 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.