Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 430 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than the HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Google Pixel 5 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the HTC One M9. HTC One M9 features a brighter display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little higher pixels number in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 5 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a much lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments.
Google Pixel 5 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the HTC One M9, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.