Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, with a score of 89 against 81. The Google Pixel 5 design has the same thickness than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it is a bit lighter. The LG G7 ThinQ has a better looking display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a bit larger screen and a better pixels count in each inch of screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
LG G7 ThinQ captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Google Pixel 5 has a superior battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.