Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, having a general score of 89 against 82.7. Google Pixel 5's construction is newer, much lighter and just a little thinner than LG G8X ThinQ. LG G8X ThinQ and Google Pixel 5 feature similar displays, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 5 features just a bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Google Pixel 5 takes clearer videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G8X ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.