Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than LG Q70, getting a overall score of 89 against 77.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the LG Q70, even though both were released only a few months apart. Google Pixel 5 has just a little better processing power than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 features a little more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite higher pixels density. The LG Q70 features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a little better battery performance than LG Q70, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The LG Q70 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 32 mega-pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.