Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. Although Google Pixel 5 and the LG Stylo 6 were released only a couple months apart, Google Pixel 5 is lighter and a bit thinner. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count per screen inch.
The LG Stylo 6 has a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 captures better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.