Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 89 score against 82.5. Google Pixel 5's design is way newer and just a little lighter, but a bit thicker than LG V30S ThinQ. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The LG V30S ThinQ's processing unit is just as good as Google Pixel 5's CPU, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG V30S ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 features longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4080mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 5 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a much lower resolution back-facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Google Pixel 5 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.