Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 89 against 81.3. The Google Pixel 5 construction is notably newer and a little bit lighter than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is a little bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a little bit more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.