Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is newer and somewhat lighter than LG V40 ThinQ's, although it's also a little bit thicker. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little greater screen density and a little larger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 5, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG V40 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 and the LG V40 ThinQ count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a lower (4K) video definition, a smaller sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Google Pixel 5 counts with greater battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.