Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ, with a overall score of 89 against 87.6. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat thinner and much lighter cellphone than LG V60 ThinQ, although both of them were only released 7 months apart. Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 5. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way better video resolution and a much more mega-pixels camera.
LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.