Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the LG Velvet, with an 89 score against 87.1. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter device than LG Velvet, but they have the same thickness. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch of display.
The LG Velvet features a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor.
The LG Velvet features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Velvet. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG Velvet, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.