Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 89 score against 80.9. Google Pixel 5's body is way lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released just 23 months before. Google Pixel 5 features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little lower pixel quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Google Pixel 5 count with incredibly similar memory for games and applications, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.