Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter device than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 5 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel count in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as Google Pixel 5, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.