Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a score of 89 against 83.4. Although Google Pixel 5 is noticeably older than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.