Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's global score of 86.3. Although Google Pixel 5 is notably older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.