Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a overall score of 89 against 87.1. Google Pixel 5 is an notably older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Google was able to make it a bit thinner and way lighter anyway. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 5 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.