Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having an 89 score against 82.6. The Google Pixel 5 design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G 5G Plus, although they were released only 3 months apart. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Moto G 5G Plus has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.