Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 89 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 5 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Power, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel number in each inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Moto G Power counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Power has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. The Google Pixel 5 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a larger camera sensor.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.