Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, getting a general score of 89 against 86.2. Google Pixel 5's body is thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G200 5G, although it was released about 13 months before. Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 5. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Moto G200 5G has as much memory to install applications and games as the Google Pixel 5 one, both of them have equal internal memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.