Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Moto Z Force, with an 89 score against 75.8. The Google Pixel 5 design is newer and a bit lighter than the Moto Z Force's, but it's just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 5 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos in low-light environments. Google Pixel 5 has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.