Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Although Google Pixel 5 is much newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it is just a little bit heavier and much thicker. Google Pixel 5 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit bigger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM. Moto Z2 Play features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 5 also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels and faster video frame rates. Google Pixel 5 features a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.