Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than Moto Z3's 77.6 global score. The Google Pixel 5 design is noticeably newer and just a bit lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Moto Z3. Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit better pixel density. Motorola Moto Z3 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also has faster video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Google Pixel 5 costs a lot more money than Moto Z3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.