Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a lot lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. The Google Pixel 5 has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit better pixel quantity per screen inch. Motorola One Hyper takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 5 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.