Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a general score of 89 against 80. Google Pixel 5's construction is newer, somewhat thinner and way lighter than Motorola One Zoom. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Zoom features a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos.
The Motorola One Zoom features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 5 costs more money than Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.