Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 5. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor, a way better video quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Google Pixel 5 one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 5 is also cheaper, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.