Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A13 5G, with a global score of 89 against 82.1. The Google Pixel 5 is an older cellphone than Galaxy A13 5G, but Google was able to make it thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 5 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 5 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.