Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 global score. The Google Pixel 5 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but Google managed to make it extremely lighter and a little thinner. Galaxy A15 5G has a bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A15 5G has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A15 5G features better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.