Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-06-29 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Samsung Galaxy A21, having a overall score of 89 against 76.1. The Google Pixel 5 design is just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy A21, although they were only released with a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A21, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a much higher video definition and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A21. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A21, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.