Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than Galaxy A22's 76.1 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a lighter and a little thinner phone than Galaxy A22, even when both were released with only 9 months difference. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot better pixel quantity per inch of display. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot lower 12.2 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.