Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-03-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Galaxy A30, having a score of 89 against 79.6. Google Pixel 5's body is newer and a little lighter than the Galaxy A30's, although it's a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little bit greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy A30 features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a camera with much less MP, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a way higher (4K) video quality. Google Pixel 5 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.